“The trouble with Scotland is it's full of Scots...”
I’ve seen this film a fair few times but not for many years, and certainly not since, well, Mel Gibson gained a reputation for ultra-conservative religious beliefs and films to match, and somewhat unfortunate comments about Jewish people. So it seems rather pointless for this Englishman to complain about this film being “anti-English”- given the subject matter, which is broadly true even if the chronology is somewhat compressed and William Wallace seems to be both suspiciously older and less upper class than he would have been. But these days it’s far more notable just how pious all the good guys are here.
Still, the film isn’t a bad melodrama and Gibson himself is rather good, and gets some equally good performance out of a cast without a huge amount of star wattage, although I’m kicking myself for not recognising Patrick McGoohan as King Edward I until now. The whole thing looks good and the battle scenes, so often dull and hard to follow, are genuinely dramatic and gripping.
It may play a few tricks with history- Edward I did not die at the same time as William Wallace was hung, drawn and quartered, and Robert the Bruce didn’t have much success until years later- but Braveheart is an entertaining and fun, if rather violent, Hollywood treatment of a somewhat neglected historical saga. Still watchable after all these years.
Welcome to my blog! I do reviews of Doctor Who from 1963 to present, plus spin-offs. As well as this I do non-Doctor Who related reviews of The Prisoner, The Walking Dead, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, Dollhouse, Blake's 7, The Crown, Marvel's Agents of SHIELD, Sherlock, Firefly, Batman and rather a lot more. There also be reviews of more than 600 films and counting. Oh, and whatever I happen to be reading, or listening to. And Marvel comics in order from 1961 onwards.
Showing posts with label Angus MacFayden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Angus MacFayden. Show all posts
Monday, 13 November 2017
Sunday, 25 November 2012
Saw III (2006)
“Live or die, Jeff. Make our
choice.”
Suddenly, after defending the
first two Saw films, I begin to see a
justification for the term “torture porn”. This is a much, much nastier film
than its two predecessors, and the scene with Timothy Young and the “rack”, in
particular, is extremely difficult to watch. This film is as good, as
intricate, and as entertaining as its predecessors but the nastiness is
starting to become excessive.
There’s a very strong connection
to the first two films, as we see what happens to Matthews and the gruesome
death of Kerry; the police procedural element has certainly not lessened. But
the film centres around Amanda who, lacking Jigsaw’s “ethics”, does not give
her victims a chance of escape. I certainly wouldn’t say there’s any moral
distinction between them (they’re both sadistic serial killers who get off on
power far more than being inspired by their claimed motives), but Jigsaw would.
And he, of course, has set the whole thing up to see whether Amanda is worthy
to be his successor. She isn’t, of course, but the means by which we discover
this are the point.
So, yes, it’s good, as far as plot
and intrigue go, and those are the selling points here, not subtext, character
or moral profundity. But even in comparison to its predecessors it’s very dark.
And the gore has definitely stepped up. We have a trepanning, with a power
drill and no anaesthetic. We have, early on, the most sadistic scenarios yet,
and that horrible “rack” scene, seen in bloody slow motion. To me this crosses
some sort of undefined line. I’m a little nervous about proceeding with the
series.
Still- John Kramer dies at the
end. How can more films possibly happen?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

