"Secrets are lies!"
It's a surprise to see that Netflix are making films (and this is a film, with a cinematic release) with such stellar casts; here we get Tom Hanks, Karen Gillan, the late Bill Paxton and John Boyega, although Emma Watson, playing American, underwhelms a little as Mae. Still, the film, an adaptation by Dave Evers of his own novel, is superb and thought-provoking.
Mae takes a job at "The Circle", an organisation that seems to be inspired by Apple, Google and Facebook in its culture, employment practices and messianic leader Eamon (Hanks), clearly based on Steve Jobs. At first things are great, with a high salary, a friendly culture on "campus" and plenty of fun and ties. Then we get our first sign of the company being something of a cult, with compulsory "optional" recreational activities and an expectation that employees will maintain a heavy presence on "TrueYou", a thinly veiled Facebook analogue. Mae realised things have gone too far with chips being planned to go into children's bones so they can be monitored and connects with reclusive and disillusioned TrueYou inventor Ty Laffitte (Boyega). Yet her ill-advised cry for help has horrific circumstances.
Mae's persuasion by Eamon to go "transparent", to have her entire life broadcast to the online public on the grounds that "secrets are lies", privacy is bad and we need to be watched to stop us doing bad things is deeply, deeply sinister. Things go predictably wrong very quickly but Mae has her revenge on Eamon- yet it isn't a happy ending as the onward march of social media to trample over our right to privacy is unimpeded, with the Circle able to track down any person for any reason and, now compulsory, delivering electoral information and public services in the ultimate corrupt privatisation. Even the Circle's claim to oppose tyrannical regimes is somewhat undercut by the fact that sending "frowns" to a dictatorship is a pretty impotent thing to do, just like all forms of clicktivism.
The film is marred, perhaps, by a strange blandness on the part of Emma Watson, but the ideas played with in this film are superb. It's worth seeing this script being performed in spite of the film's faults.
Welcome to my blog! I do reviews of Doctor Who from 1963 to present, plus spin-offs. As well as this I do non-Doctor Who related reviews of The Prisoner, The Walking Dead, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, Dollhouse, Blake's 7, The Crown, Marvel's Agents of SHIELD, Sherlock, Firefly, Batman and rather a lot more. There also be reviews of more than 600 films and counting. Oh, and whatever I happen to be reading, or listening to. And Marvel comics in order from 1961 onwards.
Showing posts with label Tom Hanks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Hanks. Show all posts
Tuesday, 11 July 2017
Friday, 17 October 2014
Forrest Gump (1994)
"Life is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're going to get."
I didn't want to like this film. I assumed it had a passively conservative agenda in that the homespun wisdom of the Deep South is a much better guide for life than those pesky liberal intellectuals. And yes, there is a bit of that. And it's not necessarily a good thing to imply that success comes to those who morally deserve it as it does to Forrest- it doesn't. But I liked it anyway. I may be a Guardian reading type and Lib Dem voter (though definitely not on Clegg's wing of the party), but I hail from the reactionary, UKIP voting rural East Midlands and, while most of my fellow denizens of this region may average some decidedly right wing views, I'm definitely proud of where I come from. Eh up, me duck.
All of which is to say that I rather enjoyed this film and I think it would be churlish to knock it for it's fairly passive conservative slant. In any case, I'm wary that I haven't read the novel on which the film is based. So let's actually talk about the film, shall we?
Firstly, Tom Hanks is superb, evoking both humour and pathos in a way that reminds one of the great Charlie Chaplin.
His choice of scripts may often leave something to be desired, but as an actor he's one of the best that Hollywood has to offer. And the film is fun, riffing enjoyably on its Zelig concept to insert Forrest into footage of the likes of John Lennon and any number of American presidents. It is, perhaps, an example of a post-Cold War America, in the middle of the "End of History" era, looking back fondly over its most recent tumultuous decades of counterculture and Vietnam.
Forrest's homespun philosophies are, of course, silly, and the film could be accused of naïveté in having it's mentally subnormal star end up rich and successful because he's nice. But one can also, if one tries hard enough, see there an existential acknowledgement of the absurdities of life and fortune, and I tried very hard indeed. The film is worth a look and great fun, even for those of us wary of possible conservative overtones.
Friday, 5 October 2012
The Simpsons Movie (2007)
"I can't believe we're paying for something we get on
TV for free. If you ask me, everybody in this theatre is a giant sucker. Especially
you!"
Let's not pretend: this is The Simpsons, so obviously it's brilliant. Let's just take the
gushing as read. I'm not going to pretend to not like 83 minutes of The
Simpsons: that would just be silly. Also, I'm trying not to just make this
review a list of funny bits from the film. Well, maybe a bit. I love the Green
Day cameo, with band going down with their ship like the band on the Titanic,
the "latest rock band to die" in Springfield. I love the fact that Springfield borders Ohio,
Nevada, Maine
and Kentucky.
I love the tasteful sex scene with the adorable Disney-style animals, which is
not as addled with bestiality as it sounds. I love "Why does everyone I
whip leave me?" I love… that'll do.
There are lots of nods to the fact that this is a movie, of
course. The opening titles are much swankier. The animation is posher, and the
credits reveal that an army of South Korean animators was hired for this. The
stakes are higher. The opening sequence with itchy and Scratchy makes a nice
metatextual reference to the fact that this is a movie based on a TV show, and the
Simpsons themselves talk over the closing titles. Maggie's first word is
"sequel". But, in spite of all that, this is basically just a really
long episode of The Simpsons. It
doesn't look particularly different from the TV show, at least on the small
screen. And that's no bad thing.
Of course, boring old politics rears its head a bit. America's
indifference to the Environment gets a bit of a dig, as does the Big Brother
surveillance society that's popping up everywhere these days. But this is
essentially just 83 minutes of sheer fun, that throws a countdown in at the
climax for the sheer Hell of it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

