“No way my wife is buried out here…”
“Your what?!”.
Nearly twenty-four hours on, and I’m still fangasming. I
loved it, obviously, but don’t expect any serious critical engagement with this
episode, or indeed reviewing, in this “review”. Instead, I shall flail about
like a flaily thing and, uhm, squee incessantly.
At last we know the solution to the Clara conundrum, and
it’s a neatly elegant one. She is indeed just an ordinary person, if a little
more magnificent than usual, and it’s only when she sacrifices herself, and
shards of her persona are scattered throughout space and time that she becomes
extraordinary. The other Claras are the soufflés; the original Clara is the
recipe. It is at the same time so gloriously complicated and so elegantly
simple. And this is what leads to the cliff hanger, as the Doctor heads into
his own timeline to save her.
We see River again, or rather a backup of her from after her
death in The Silence in the Library two-parter. She is therefore at the latest part in her life, if you can call it
that, than we have ever seen her. She has what seems to be her final goodbye to
the Doctor and they share a passionate kiss such as has never quite seen before
in Doctor Who. Intriguingly, we discover towards the end that River is solid and
seems to have a physical existence. This added mystery implies we will be
seeing her again. Spoilers, sweetie!
Vastra, Jenny and Strax are brilliantly used, as always. They
are the glue that holds the story together. The concept of a séance across time
is inspired, and also rather convenient, as this is the means by which Moffat
assembles his cast of the Doctor’s friends, and thus allows the plot to happen.
We get a touching glimpse into the kinky but loving relationship between Vastra
and Jenny. Vastra is distraught when Jenny “dies”, and her comments to Strax
are revealing: he remarks that the heart is a simple thing and she replies,
simply “I have not found it so”.
Strax, of course, is at his comical best, but in this case
this serves as a contrast with his radically different behaviour after the
Great Intelligence has begun to erase the Doctor’s time stream, becoming hostile
and humorous. And, yes, this is my cue to flail about wildly at all the old
clips, old Doctors and such forth.
The continuity porn begins immediately, and has me jumping
up and down like a kangaroo on a trampoline on speed, as we see the Doctor and
Susan nicking the TARDIS all those years ago! At last, we have it confirmed
that Susan was with him at the time and, oddly, he’s wearing the same Edwardian
clothes that we see him wearing in An Unearthly Child, un-Gallifreyan though they are. Loads more clips follow,
in which all the Doctors appear in
varying levels of detail, including an interesting one in which footage of Patrick Troughton from The Five Doctors is inserted in to
footage of modern California. Many of the clips look a little odd, as the
picture quality does not match modern HD, but it is awesome to see them.
Almost as fangasmy is the fact that we finally get to see
Trenzalore and the Doctor’s tomb. We do not, after all, hear the Doctor’s name
spoken, but it is both the key to the Great Intelligence’s scheme and important
to the final scene, of which more shortly. I expected to see the Silence in
this episode, but they are, it is perhaps implied, the good guys in that they
only intend to prevent the Doctor being erased from history and the great
suffering that would cause. Instead, we get another great Moffat villain in the
Whisper Men, who remind me of the Gentlemen from the Buffy episode Hush.
But the thing we’re all really hyper about, twenty-four
hours later, is John Hurt’s previously
unknown Doctor. Who is he, and why is he so beyond the pale to his subsequent
incarnations? We face the challenging task of waiting a whole six months to
find out. See you on the twenty-third of November. Excited much?!
Funny enough, while critcisims of the Moffat Era were not as vocal as Chibnall were, I remembr some thinking that Clara being responsible for everything in the Doctor’s life, as shown in “The Name of the Doctor” is a terrible idea. They habe Clara get sent back in time to spend her life rescuing the Doctor? She even went back and picked out the TARDIS for him? She apparently even stopped him from falling from his umbrella as the 7th doctor?
ReplyDeleteThat doesn’t make her into a hero. That doesn’t make her some new, amazing person. It doesn’t make her fantastic or unique or powerful.
But you know what it does do?
It undermines every single second of every minute that has passed for the last 50 years. Because it wasn’t Jo, or Sarah Jane, or Susan, or Ace, or Ian, or Barbara, or Jamie, or even Rose, Donna, Jack, Wilf, or Martha that keep the Doctor safe. They don’t matter anymore. All the times they have saved the Doctor don’t matter anymore.
Because no matter what they do, no matter how much danger they or the Doctor are in, it’s not up to them to save him,. Their actions mean nothing. Because Clara was born to save the Doctor. And if the Doctor is safe, then they have her to thank. It’s not their bravery, or cunning, or strength that saves the day.
It’s just Clara.
It was Clara who distracted the Daleks so the Doctor and his friends could escape their cell. It was Clara who stopped the Nestene Consciousness from attacking Earth. It was Clara who stopped the Doctor from drowning with the Racnoss. It was Clara who walked the Earth in the Year That Never Was.
And that doesn’t make her a hero. It makes her a thief. A ghost. A shadow. A slave tied helplessly to the orders to save, protect, serve.
She’s not a hero. She doesn’t have a choice. She doesn’t know where she is, and she doesn’t know who she is.
All she knows is that she must save the Doctor.
And she dies, every single time.
She’s not a hero. She’s not an impossible girl.
She’s a mockery of every person he has ever met, good or bad.
Because she’s inevitable. The heroes stand back idly as she passes by, because they know, no matter what they do, they are worse than useless next to her, and the villains drop to their knees in despair, their plans unraveled at the seams by her mere presence.
Because she has erased every single threat against his life. Against his companion’s lives. Everything they have gone though has been without meaning, because their continuation was assured. They never faced any danger. Their tears and sorrow and despair were for naught. So basically the first 50 years of the show were actually being fixed by an impossible girl.
You're right- and there lies the problem with retconning in general. It imposes a meaning on older stories, characters and lore that was never intended at the time, and with no thought for the context of those older stories- it's using the past in order to provide a quick dopamine thrill in the present. It may feel good now... but it rides roughshod over the past without stopping to understand it.
ReplyDeleteBut personally I watch old stories on their own terms. Pre-The War Games, for example? Time Lords are not a thing, the Doctor's origin and species is unknown.
You know, I know DW has never been the most consistent show, but Chibnall's timeless child recton really throws everything that even Moffat's era established out of the window. Clara jumps into the Doctor's timestream, which was his entire life, from Gailfrey to Trenzalore, not just his memories. Notably, she (and 11) don't see any pre-Hartnell incarnations; There was no Fugitive Doctor, no Timeless Children, no Mobius Doctors. Even the War Doctor was there (It is not made explicit, but it is suggested that 11 is mentally trying to repress the war incarnation, even though it doesn't explain why War was absent from the Doctor's regenerations when the Doctor was trying to get Mr. Clever out of his head, also showcasing Moffat's plot holes ).
ReplyDeletePrecisely. Oh, I'm sure one could come up with some awkwardly convoluted way of squaring all these circles... but why on Earth would anyone want to bother?
ReplyDeleteThe Doctor's past is simply a mess. I could never support a literal reboot, so the only option is to just ignore it!
I don't know why my words seem to be keep getting omittied here and I know I may be a killjoy for pointing out plot holes but in Time of the Doctor, Clara made the time lords save the Doctor, so that he doesn't die on Trenzalore. Which means that his remains, the temporal scar we saw in The Name of the Doctor, isn't there. Which means that Clara can never throw herself into it and become scattered amongst the Doctor's timeline. Which means that her Oswin incarnation can never wipe the Daleks' memories of the Doctor. Not that it matters, because they all get their memories of him back with no trouble anyway, so that was entirely pointless. And 11 never met Victoria Clara, so 11 cannot possibly go to find Clara.
ReplyDeleteI've noticed that certain comments I'm notified don't end up appearing. I've no idea why. But yeah, if you think through the timey-wimey stuff, it's deliciously contradictory and in many places self-cancelling, but that's part of the fun!
Delete