Pages

Tuesday, 20 September 2011

Doctor Who: The God Complex



“Every time the Doctor gets pally with someone, I have this overwhelming urge to notify their next of kin.”

On the surface, this episode is a good, if not great, one-off tale with a twist at the end. But I get a strong impression that, far more importantly, it rehearses the main themes and foreshadows the events which will end this season- and I say this as someone who’s spoiler-free. The above quote from Rory is one of many examples in which we explore Amy’s and Rory’s contrasting attitudes to, and confidence in, the Doctor. Their departure is foreshadowed throughout the episode, and yet I think we all suspect that their “departure” is a massive red herring. Anyway…

This series, and the Moffat era in general, is getting quite a reputation for more creative directing, and the pre-titles sequences have shown some fantastic shots of late, with Night Terrors being a particular highlight. This episode does it again; I particularly loved the shot of the stairwell, suggesting a Castrovalva-like shifting geography with great economy and style. There are some nice-looking shots from the POV of the CCTV, too, which give a real feeling of being watched.

There are lots of strange and scary things in the early minutes of this episode: the clown, the photographer, the man in the (deliberately?) unconvincing gorilla suit, but the most eerie of the lot has to be the hall full of ventriloquist’s dummies, all moving their heads in unison.

We have a nicely fleshed-out guest cast. Rita- intelligent, resourceful, brave, nice, and liked a lot by the audience and therefore the viewer- is a bit of a Mary Sue character, and therefore doomed, but of course we’re supposed to know that. The Doctor even seems to offer her a trip in the TARDIS at one point, which of course makes her death inevitable, in a Lynda with a “y” sort of way. Howie is a tiresome conspiracy theorist (I really don’t like conspiracy theories, they are not harmless, and anyone reading this who believes in any of that nonsense should read this book), and therefore also doomed. Joe is doomed already before we meet him. This leaves Gibbis, a cowardly alien from Tivoli, most invaded planet in the universe. This is a funny yet sinister performance from David Walliams, and of course he doesn’t die. The cowardly ones never do in Doctor Who.

The first few minutes set up the situation as we understand it- people are drawn to the hotel, given a room with their biggest individual fear, and eventually come to welcome their own inevitable death with religious fervour. No one leaves alive. It all pays off later, except for one bit: what’s the significance of the disappearing fire exit found by Rory? As far as I can see, this is never followed up.

The main flaw in this episode, and by no means a fundamental one, is that the handling of religious themes is a bit clumsy. I don’t think there’s any great message intended here about religion- it’s basically there as a metaphor for Amy’s faith in the Doctor, about which more later- and I say this as an atheist, but it comes across that way without, I think, meaning to. This is awkward, especially given the emphasis on faith, and the foregrounding of Rita’s Islamic beliefs. The implicit assumption that faith is a weakness, and the Doctor’s casual statement at the end that the minotaur “god” was overthrown when its worshippers became more civilised and went “all secular” (that isn’t what the word “secular” means!) is arguably a bit arrogant. I’ve no problem with arguments that there isn’t a God (I myself think this is the most likely probability by far), but there’s no need to be arrogant, or rude, or Richard Dawkinsy about it.

There’s a lot of foreshadowing of the end of the episode; after Howie’s death, the Doctor notices Rory speaking of his time in the TARDIS in the past tense, and he speaks admiringly of Howie’s speech therapy, to get rid of his stutter, as a phenomenal achievement, implying that he sees just as much potential for adventure in his everyday life as a nurse as in his travels with the Doctor. His chat with Rita on the stairs is also full of foreboding; her suggestion that he has a “God complex” (the title of the episode is clever, multi-layered and rather interesting in terms of the Doctor’s development as a character) is more perceptive than is probably intended, and the Doctor seems to accept that his whimsical adventuring is rather frivolous, “which is why grown-ups were invented. Rita, by contrast, has a serious and proper job with responsibilities, as indeed does Rory. I’m also reminded of the home truths spoken by the older Amy in the previous episode.

What does the Doctor see in his room? We hear the cloister bell, but we don’t see anything. Perhaps there is a clue, though? Can we perhaps read something into the “Do Not Disturb” sign?  Perhaps the Doctor is sleeping with someone in that room, perhaps married, perhaps to River Song? Perhaps his fear is of something symbolised by marriage, such as commitment, which would be anathema to his wandering lifestyle? Perhaps it terrified him, because it would make him into a “grown-up”?

His words to Amy at the end show an obvious parallel with his words to Amy in The Curse of Fenric, although this time he doesn’t want Amy to hate him, just to lose her faith in him! I think what he’s telling her is simply the unvarnished truth, although these things are of course subjective: “I took you with me because I was vain. I want to be adored. I’m not a hero; I really am just a madman in a box.”

I was overjoyed at the links to the Nimon (yay!) and intrigued that Amy’s question of what Time Lords pray to is left unanswered. But the most interesting words spoken at the end of the main story, with the hotel dissolved into an empty cyberspace grid, are by the dying minotaur: “An ancient creature, drenched in the blood of the innocent, drifting in space through an endless, shifting maze…to such a creature, death would be a gift.”

The departure of Amy (especially) and Rory, although effective and touching, is bound to be a red herring; they’ll be back for the series finale, I’m sure, although I have no idea whether they’ll stay after that. The Doctor ends the story alone, so alone, slumped in the TARDIS…

By the way, as someone who’s a little deaf, I have to give a virtual high five to the person (definitely a fan!) who did the subtitles. The TARDIS leaves with a Vworp! Vworp!...


(Probably no blogging until Saturday now, and there might not be anything other than current Doctor Who until the end of September. Real ife intrudes, I;m afraid! Fear not, though- normal service witll be resumed from the start of October!)


4 comments:

  1. On GB I've tried to make the case that this episode (along with TGWW) contains some of the finest characterization ever seen in the history of our beloved show. Here it's The Doctor's 'faith destroying' speech, specifically 'I took you with me because I was vain.' Oh, man. I just burst into tears at that, because it's such a horrible yet fundamental truth about our hero, and would have been just as painful, powerful and right coming from the mouth of any incarnation. It's not just loneliness that drives The Doctor to choose companions -- he wants someone to see what good he does, how hard he tries to make people better. In one line, his character is expanded on levels where it has never been explored.

    And once again, what a lovely (literary quality!) SF idea -- a god, rejected by it's worshippers, who cannot bring themselves to destroy this thing they both fear and love. That's freakin' DEEP, and works in beautifully with the theme of the Doctor being seen as both savior and terror to the people he tries to 'make better'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh yes, a great SF concept, and I'm amazed that its implicit "God is dead" message didn't cause more of a reaction!

    I completely agree with your thoughts about the Doctor's characterisation here. And it's very interesting that the whole "I took you with me because I was vain" is basically taking one of the Doctor's known character traits and showing it from a much darker angle. It'll be interesting to see if this gets developed in the coming seasons.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not to bring the odor of Tennant bashing here, one of the reasons I love Matt so much more is his ability to pull those set-piece speeches off in such a powerfully underplayed way. I think the 'Colonel Runaway' speech is the finest example -- such seething rage, so barely contained! "I want children laughing, outside your door, because they've found the house of Colonel Runaway..."

    Now that's an utterly believable fate worse than death (to a soldier) without the fairy tale 'WTF?' that the ending of THE FAMILY OF BLOOD gave me.

    This is all, of course, personal opinion, but I've never claimed otherwise. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh yes, it's a fantastic and interesting performance It's an interesting contrast with Tennant who (not to knock him either- I like Tennant!) plays the Doctor very much in the way a fan would see him- ie the received wisdom of what's "Doctorish". Matt Smith doesn't do that, not being a fan, so we get a much more interesting style of performance.

    I know what you mean about the ending to "Family of Blood". It's amazing, but not really the sort of thing that fits with Tennant. It's more the sort of thing you'd expect to see in a Cornell New Adventure... which is sort of appropriate, really!

    ReplyDelete